|
Events
Updated 6/14/06
Save the Date!
ILADS' 2006
Scientific Session will be held October 21-22 at the Crown Plaza
in Philadelphia:
The Crowne
Plaza Philadelphia, Center City
1800 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19103
Phone 215-561-7500
Fax 215-561-2556.
Centrally located
in the business district, The Crowne Plaza is just steps away from
fine dining and shopping.
Click here
for a printer-friendly Registration Form.
The convention
rate is $139.
To make hotel reservations call 215-561-7500 or 1-866-618-0410.
Identify yourself as an attendee of the Lyme meeting.
Also, American
Airlines is offering attendees of the ILADS 2006 Annual Conference
a 5% discount on any non-discounted fare.
Mention the name "ILADS" when making reservations for travel October
18-25, 2006.
The contact phone number is 1-800-433-1790.
The promotional code is A48H6AM
Who may attend?
All ILADS members are encouraged to attend. Medical doctors are
welcome. Other health care providers may request special permission
to attend. Lyme groups may apply to allow up to two people. They
will be screened as action groups. The meeting is not open to the
general public.
SPECIAL
OPPORTUNITY FOR CALIFORNIA DOCTORS
CALDA
will reimburse up to $750.00 out-of-pocket expenses for
any practicing California healthcare professional to attend
the 2006 annual conferences.
The
grants will be given on a first-come, first-serve basis
and will be given only to people attending the conferences
for the first time.
CALDA
will also reimburse any practicing California healthcare
professional or medical or nursing student in California
for the first year cost of membership in ILADS.
For information, email info@lymedisease.org or call 415-927-9553.
|
The following
is a synopsis of the October, 2005 LDA and ILADS conferences.
For the original article, please go to
http://www.lymediseaseaction.org.uk/news/usaconf2005.htm
The LDA and
ILADS conferences, Philadelphia, October 2005
A presentation for Lyme Disease Action by Dr. David Owen (UK LLMD).
Below is a
summary of the conferences subdivided into the areas of science,
medicine and politics. The order within the sections reflects the
order in which presentations were given.
The science
The conference
began with Sven Bergstrom PhD who has many years of experience in
the Borrelia field. His work has focussed on Borrelia in Africa
where the problem of relapsing fever (RF) occurs, a disease caused
by Borrelia species. There are many analogies with Lyme disease
which itself is relapsing in nature. It was interesting to note
that the problem of relapsing fever is eclipsed by malaria in Africa.
The two often co-exist (up to 10% by PCR) but little attention is
given to the RF if malaria is present. Mechanisms of immune evasion
in RF were discussed and there is strong evidence that RF may persist
for long periods: It is not just an acute disease as we have been
lead to believe.
Steven Norris
PhD has been working on factors which allow Borrelia to survive
in the host for long periods. Although Borrelia is fully sequenced
the function of most of its proteins is not known. It is apparent
some genes are needed for survival in ticks and others in mammals.
Many interact with the immune system in complex ways. Add on the
diversity of the Borrelia genome and it is clear that the work to
be done here will keep scientists busy for a very long time indeed
and we will continue to be bewildered by the complexity of it all.
Dr. Klaus-Peter
Hunfeld presented data relating to the sensitivity of Borrelia burgdorferi
in vitro. Although variable degrees of sensitivity do occur there
is no evidence of increased resistance after exposure to antibiotics
in vitro. Comment Classical resistance is mediated by enzyme
induction and it is reassuring to note that this does not seem to
occur in Borrelia. The reason for this may be that Borrelia simply
does not need to use this strategy for survival - it has so many
others it uses!
Terry Schultze
PhD talked on the ways in which tick populations can be controlled.
Biological control remains a dream but locally populations can be
controlled with acaricides using various strategies. Correct timing
of applications is crucial and varies with location.
The US military
appears to be taking Lyme very seriously. Pat Smith, President of
the LDA (Lyme Disease Association), told conference that the military
may soon have access to portable equipment developed in US Army
CHPPM which is based on PCR testing and enables them to determine
whether a particular tick carries Borrelia or any of its co-infections.
This will allow targeted treatment of bitten soldiers to be given
on the spot. Comment - I wonder with prompt treatment how much future
morbidity could be prevented?
Dr. Joshua
Zimmerberg presented work on the culturing of Borrelia. Failure
to culture Borrelia is perhaps the main reason that Borrelia has
escaped attention for so long. There is hope that the culturing
which takes place in gently rotating chambers will aid research
into Borrelia.
In the ILADS
meeting Jyotsna Shah PhD told us about testing as carried out in
the Igenex lab. Igenex is the world leader in TBDs. The lab recognises
the arbitrary restriction on Western Blot testing imposed by CDC
criteria. The result is that more patients with Lyme disease receive
benefit when Igenex is used. Testing should not be relied upon for
LD diagnosis but to some degree we are all guilty of placing too
much reliance on technology in medical practice.
Testing for
LD is improving and Bernard Raxlen MD told the conference about
promising findings using the new peptide based Elisa test. When
this is used more cases will be picked up especially if the test
is applied to co-infection resultant antibodies as well.
Alan MacDonald
MD presented his work on Alzheimers dementia and Borrelia.
He first publicised work in this field in the early 80s but his
novel ideas were severely criticised. Borrelia DNA is being found
by Dr. MacDonald in Alzheimer brains and this supports his earlier
morphological work. Comment I hope that this time his work
will be received without prejudice.
Garth Nicolson
PhD has spent many years working in the field of Chronic Fatigue
Syndrome (CFS) like diseases and has highlighted the importance
of Mycoplasma in the past. Mycoplasma can be found in ticks and
is another co-infection for Lyme. Prof. Nicolson presented data
relating to NTFactor, a commercially available nutritional supplement
which may help some patients with persistent fatigue.
The Medicine
Lyme is such
a huge field that sub-specialists (or perhaps super-specialist
is a preferred term?) may be commonplace in the future.
Gregory Storch
MD is one such specialist. He presented a talk about Ehrlichiosis.
Anaplasmosis a field in which he has great experience. Some very
useful clinical pointers were given to a grateful audience.
Martin Fried
MD reported a particular type of rash which may be common in Bartonella
infections. He termed it a neo-vascularisation rash (new vessels
induced by pro-inflammatory cytokines) and gave hints to help us
distinguish it from striae or stretchmarks which it resembles. Comment
Funny rashes occur frequently in medicine and with modern
technology we have a possibility of explaining some of them. The
day will come I am sure when the investigation of any patient with
a funny rash will be incomplete without a full Lyme co-infection
screen.
Ed Masters
MD like all LDMDs is not afraid of controversy. He pointed out the
official inanity in failing to recognise Lone Star ticks as carrying
Lyme disease. Bb has not been found in Lone Star ticks but EM and
a syndrome similar to chronic Lyme disease do occur after Lone Star
tick bites. Comment - Surely it will not be long before the agent
(already referred to as B. Lonestari) causing Masters
or STARI disease will be proven.
The Lonestar
tick was also the focus of Susan Little DVM. She has collected data
from her veterinary practice which supports the notion that Lone
Star tick carried disease is a major problem for the white tailed
deer population and by inference the public. The ways in which Lonestari
Lyme differ from conventional Lyme have yet to be determined. In
the meantime why not just Lyme?
Working alone
and despite being in full time practice Daniel Cameron MD has performed
a double blind study to examine the possible benefit of repeat antibiotic
treatment for Lyme patients. Benefits to patients in terms of their
improved functionality following repeat treatment were shown. Comment
I hope it will not be too long before it will be considered
to be unethical to carry out studies such as this but in the meantime
the requirement for so called evidence based medical practice means
that they must be carried out. (I say so called because all practice
should be evidence based - it is the level or strength of evidence
which is scrutinised)
Continuing
with clinical trials Brian Fallon MD presented the John Drulle Memorial
Lecture. The results of a trial which is big and meticulously designed
were presented. Comment - Watch this space because once published
this work should rock the medical profession. The study elegantly
demonstrates that re-treatment with antibiotics does benefit Lyme
encepholpathic patients.
It is unlikely
that antibiotics are going to be the full answer to Lyme disease.
All manners of intervention may help and Dr. Richard Brown MD and
Daniel Kinderlehrer MD gave a long list of alternative therapies
which may help patients with any chronic debilitating condition.
Returning to
antibiotics Joseph Burrascano Jr MD presented a case of chronic
Lyme disease where the patient failed to recover despite lengthy
combination therapies. The patient did improve after a course of
Levofloxacin and Dr. Burrascano postulated that the he may have
been treating a new as yet unidentified Bartonella like organism.
In the ILADS
conference Raphael Stricker MD presented the results of a study
of re-treatment of 174 adults with chronic Lyme disease with a combination
of Clarithromycin and Cefdinir. This observational study showed
patients benefited from such a combination but no comparisons were
made and it was acknowledged that different combinations of antibiotics
will continuously need to be examined in the future.
On the topic
of combinations Azoles may become a recommended part of future treatment
strategies. So suggested Stephen Phillips MD. He has been researching
the properties of this fascinating group of compounds some of which
are already widely used in medicine. Some are used as anti-fungals
but many have anti-Borrelial properties in addition. Reference was
made to a European study by Schardt published last year where fluconazole
appeared to help Neuroborreliosis patients. Another space to watch.
Richard Horowitz
MD presented an overview of co-infections and reminded us just how
many Tick Borne Diseases there are. Overlooking co-infections was
suggested to be a reason for many of the treatment failures in chronic
Lyme disease.
Ginger Savely
RN talked about the topic of Morgellons. These are skin lesions
which are commonly dismissed as dermatitis artefacta or lesions
caused by delusions of parasitosis. The lesions are usually antibiotic
responsive and are commonly associated with positive Lyme tests.
Comment Erythema Migrans (EM) may be multiple and of variable
morphology and may ulcerate. Could Morgellons be a form of EM?
Christine Green
MD and Joseph Burrascano MD spoke about Lyme Disease treatment in
their practice. With massive clinical experience behind them tips
were given on when it might be advisable to increase treatment (ramp
up) or decrease treatment (clamp down).
The Politics
Patricia Smith,
president of the Lyme Disease Association of America, gave an update
on the politics. The news is good with activity in many states.
Doctors who practise in Lyme in the states will have a little more
protection and it is particularly noteworthy that in New Jersey
the State Board of Medical examiners contacted the LDA in a search
for Lyme specialists. Again in New Jersey bills have been passed
which should help to stop Insurance companies refusing to fund treatment
for Lyme patients.
Finally the
LDA are challenging the CDC. The LDA are attempting to use new legislation
to prevent the CDC from publishing (on the web) guidelines for clinical
use which have not been peer reviewed.
Dr. David Owen
November, 2005
Please
email the webmaster
if you encounter problems with this web site.
[back to events]
|